| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
namara Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:26 am Post subject: Vanguard Star |
|
|
Just the best thing that ever happened to me. Proven performer all
these years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Andrew Koenig Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:14 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
"W. Wells" <otf70@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:461390da$1$18883$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
Wellington is even better.
|
It's also harder to get into. The minimum initial purchase is $10,000, and
I think that until recently there was a $25,000/year purchase limit. The
STAR fund, in contrast, has only a $1,000 minimum purchase and no maximum.
And the two funds are not far apart in performance. If you had invested
$10,000 in Wellington ten years ago, you'd have $25,624 today; if you had
chosen the STAR fund, you'd have $24,279.
I'm not gonna knock Wellington. But you can't buy it if you're opening an
IRA, because the IRA maximum is below the Wellington minimum. In which case
I think STAR is a fine alternative. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ed Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:15 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
"W. Wells" <otf70@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:461390da$1$18883$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
Wellington is even better.
|
I disagree.
I think one is as good as the other. STAR could be a one fund solution for
an investor, Wellington would need a little more diversification. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
W. Wells Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
Wellington is even better.
"namara <---Long and Lovin it" <namara@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1175653611.517621.243880@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
Just the best thing that ever happened to me. Proven performer all
these years.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jerry Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
I normally don't go for index funds, but their Mid Cap Growth Index (VMGIX)
fund looks good to me.
Jerry
"namara <---Long and Lovin it" <namara@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1175653611.517621.243880@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
Just the best thing that ever happened to me. Proven performer all
these years.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Randy Nevin Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:07 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
That's a new fund that has only a 6 month record. For a longer track record,
look at the Vanguard Midcap Index (VIMSX) (almost 9 years).
"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4614eec4$0$16680$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
| Quote: |
I normally don't go for index funds, but their Mid Cap Growth Index (VMGIX)
fund looks good to me.
Jerry
"namara <---Long and Lovin it" <namara@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1175653611.517621.243880@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Just the best thing that ever happened to me. Proven performer all
these years. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Ed Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
"Randy Nevin" <randynevinNOSPAM@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:XLudnfuxuJYVn4jbnZ2dnUVZ_tijnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: |
That's a new fund that has only a 6 month record. For a longer track
record, look at the Vanguard Midcap Index (VIMSX) (almost 9 years).
|
It's an index fund.
http://www.mscibarra.com/products/indices/us/annualReturns.jsp
http://www.mscibarra.com/products/indices/us/performance.jsp
| Quote: |
"Jerry" <nospam@???> wrote in message
news:4614eec4$0$16680$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
I normally don't go for index funds, but their Mid Cap Growth Index
(VMGIX) fund looks good to me.
Jerry
"namara <---Long and Lovin it" <namara@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1175653611.517621.243880@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
Just the best thing that ever happened to me. Proven performer all
these years.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Flasherly Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
namara Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 11:22 pm Post subject: Re: Vanguard Star |
|
|
On Apr 4, 8:15?am, "Ed" <fri...@fishinthe.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
"W. Wells" <o...@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:461390da$1$18883$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
Wellington is even better.
I disagree.
I think one is as good as the other. STAR could be a one fund solution for
an investor, Wellington would need a little more diversification.
|
Good point. Some of the other posts are bringing up other types of
funds in the comparison to STAR. The star fund is not only a
"balanced fund" it is a fund of funds. The charts offered in the
posts of the other funds mentioned are impressive in the short run.
But the Star just keeps on shinning long term. Like I said it has
been very good to me.
Have a good Easter gang
Namara |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|