| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:03 pm Post subject: 10 Busted Investment Myths |
|
|
"The market slump isn't just shredding millions of college funds and
retirement accounts. It's also shredding the financial playbook that
many American families had come to rely on to protect and grow their
savings. Think of all the rules and beliefs that worked reliably for
decades, and which have been trashed in the last year..."
Wall Street Journal: http://tinyurl.com/BustedMyths |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Spacey Spade Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:42 pm Post subject: Re: 10 Busted Investment Myths |
|
|
On Jul 10, 11:10 am, "Steven L." <sdlit...@earthlink.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
vg...@safe-mail.net wrote:
"The market slump isn't just shredding millions of college funds and
retirement accounts. It's also shredding the financial playbook that
many American families had come to rely on to protect and grow their
savings. Think of all the rules and beliefs that worked reliably for
decades, and which have been trashed in the last year..."
Wall Street Journal:http://tinyurl.com/BustedMyths
I read this article.
Actually, the conventional wisdom that "housing prices always
appreciate" has NOT been "true for decades." We had a big housing slump
around 1990. Lots of homeowners found themselves upside down on their
mortgages through no fault of their own.
OTOH, the endless series of bubbles we've experienced: the "dot.com"
bubble, the housing bubble, the commodities bubble, etc., has gotten a
lot of economists to question the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) once
again. If the market is truly "efficient" and news about overpriced
assets are available to everybody, then why do these bubbles keep
occurring? What are these investors betting on?
--
Steven L.
Email: sdlit...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
Surely, you know the masses are easily fooled by those in power...
Am I being cynical in assuming that those in power are usually not
very altruistic? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
rick++ Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 8:55 pm Post subject: Re: 10 Busted Investment Myths |
|
|
I love those "rear view mirror" dorks who say
"last year it was obvious" ... B.S. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Steven L. Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:10 pm Post subject: Re: 10 Busted Investment Myths |
|
|
vgenx@safe-mail.net wrote:
| Quote: |
"The market slump isn't just shredding millions of college funds and
retirement accounts. It's also shredding the financial playbook that
many American families had come to rely on to protect and grow their
savings. Think of all the rules and beliefs that worked reliably for
decades, and which have been trashed in the last year..."
Wall Street Journal: http://tinyurl.com/BustedMyths
|
I read this article.
Actually, the conventional wisdom that "housing prices always
appreciate" has NOT been "true for decades." We had a big housing slump
around 1990. Lots of homeowners found themselves upside down on their
mortgages through no fault of their own.
OTOH, the endless series of bubbles we've experienced: the "dot.com"
bubble, the housing bubble, the commodities bubble, etc., has gotten a
lot of economists to question the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) once
again. If the market is truly "efficient" and news about overpriced
assets are available to everybody, then why do these bubbles keep
occurring? What are these investors betting on?
--
Steven L.
Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
JB Guest
|
Posted: Fri Jul 11, 2008 11:00 am Post subject: Re: 10 Busted Investment Myths |
|
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:nsudnUgLRI_sqevVnZ2dnUVZ_gydnZ2d@earthlink.com...
| Quote: |
vgenx@safe-mail.net wrote:
"The market slump isn't just shredding millions of college funds and
retirement accounts. It's also shredding the financial playbook that
many American families had come to rely on to protect and grow their
savings. Think of all the rules and beliefs that worked reliably for
decades, and which have been trashed in the last year..."
Wall Street Journal: http://tinyurl.com/BustedMyths
I read this article.
Actually, the conventional wisdom that "housing prices always appreciate"
has NOT been "true for decades." We had a big housing slump around 1990.
Lots of homeowners found themselves upside down on their mortgages through
no fault of their own.
OTOH, the endless series of bubbles we've experienced: the "dot.com"
bubble, the housing bubble, the commodities bubble, etc., has gotten a lot
of economists to question the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) once
again. If the market is truly "efficient" and news about overpriced
assets are available to everybody, then why do these bubbles keep
occurring? What are these investors betting on?
--
Steven L.
Email: sdlitvin@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
A Mathematician Plays the Stockmarket by Paulos has an interesting logical
argument regarding EMH. From memory it goes something like this....if
everyone believed the market was efficient, the prices would never change
and there would be no market. When nobody believes in EMH, the market will
be dynamic and efficient. I know I mangled this a bit but the basic idea
makes sense to me.
If that's true, blind belief in the EMH or blatent rejection of it are both
incorrect.
I tend to view the market as a non-stationary random process where none of
the statistics can be relied upon except for historical characterizations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

246 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|